The
irrigation schemes were Mashushu, Fertilis and Mantlhane. Heads of household
were older at Mashushu (average age=68) followed by Fertilis (59) and finally
Manthlane (56). Household sizes ranged between 5 and 6. Some 21.7% of heads of
household (37.5%-Mashushu, 20%-Fertilis and 7.7%-Manthlane) had no formal
education, half (55%-Fertilis, 50%-Mashushu, and 53.8%-Manthlane) had primary
while 25.3% (38.5%-Manthlane, 25%-Fertilis and 12.5%-Mashushu) had secondary
education. Household income varied (average R26,991-Manthlane,
R24,780-Mashushu, R21,807-Fertilis) across the schemes. The majority (88%) of
farmers had = 40% of income from farming. On average, individual farmers made
profit in all schemes (R6,654.50-Mashushu, R4,565.59-Fertilis, R5,938.78-
Manthlane). Production increased with cost of tillage (p<0.01)and marketing
(p<0.05). The cost for operating the WUA was estimated at R15 500 / annum
while the income was estimated at R16 700 / annum. The WUA for farmers in the
study irrigation schemes would therefore be economically viable.
Website: https://www.arjonline.org/agricultural-sciences/american-research-journal-of-agriculture/
Website: https://www.arjonline.org/agricultural-sciences/american-research-journal-of-agriculture/
No comments:
Post a Comment